Skip to content
New Hate, Old Story

ArticlesAnalysis

No, Israel is not the reason antisemitism exists

Israel-related wars can trigger antisemitic spikes, but they did not create antisemitism. The same claims about Jews killing children, starting wars, and controlling governments existed for centuries before modern Israel.

About 8 min read

If someone says antisemitism would disappear if Israel disappeared, they are not explaining hate. They are giving hate a permission slip.

Israel can be criticized. Israeli governments can be blamed for their own policies. Wars involving Israel can trigger real spikes in anti-Jewish abuse. But that is not the same as saying Israel caused antisemitism, or that Jews around the world can make hatred stop by making Israel vanish.

TL;DR

The sentence "Israel causes antisemitism" hides a nasty switch. It starts as criticism of a state, then turns into conditional safety for Jews: stop having that country, stop supporting that country, stop being associated with that country, and maybe people will stop hating you.

That is not how bigotry works. Israel may affect the timing, language, and intensity of some antisemitism today. It did not invent the hatred. The hatred already had scripts: child murder, secret control, dual loyalty, world-war plots, media control, blood, greed, poison, treason. Israel gets pasted into those scripts because the scripts were already there.

What the argument gets wrong

Reasonable criticism

Name an Israeli law, minister, court ruling, military order, settlement policy, strike, hostage policy, or diplomatic decision. Then argue evidence and consequences.

That is normal political accountability.

The antisemitic move

Treat Jews everywhere as answerable for Israel, or claim anti-Jewish hatred is their own fault because Israel exists.

That is collective blame with a policy vocabulary.

The question is not whether Israel can be criticized. Of course it can. The question is whether criticism of Israel explains a vandalized synagogue in London, a Jewish student hiding a necklace in Paris, an American conspiracy post about Jews controlling Congress, or a meme saying Jews drink children's blood. If the answer is always "Israel," the argument is not analyzing behavior. It is laundering old contempt through a new headline.

Antisemitism existed long before Israel

Modern Israel was founded in 1948. The history of antisemitism is much older. Encyclopaedia Britannica defines antisemitism as hostility toward or discrimination against Jews, and traces anti-Jewish hostility back to the ancient Greco-Roman world, where religious difference and refusal to worship imperial gods were read by some as disloyalty.

In medieval Europe, Britannica describes Jews being denied citizenship and civil rights, excluded from guilds and professions, forced into distinctive clothing or ghettos, expelled from countries, and targeted by ritual-murder claims. None of that was caused by the Israeli government. There was no Israeli government.

"Antisemitism has existed to some degree wherever Jews have settled outside Palestine."

(Encyclopaedia Britannica, Antisemitism)

That sentence does not mean every society hated Jews in the same way or with the same intensity. It means the phenomenon cannot be explained by a state founded in the middle of the 20th century. The timeline alone kills that claim.

The same old tropes keep reappearing

The strongest proof is not abstract. It is the content of the accusations. When people blame Israel for antisemitism, listen to the insults they claim Israel "caused." So often, they are not new arguments about borders or laws. They are old fantasies with Israel swapped in.

Yes, Israel-related events can trigger spikes

A serious article should not pretend that Israel is irrelevant to modern antisemitism. It is clearly relevant as a trigger, symbol, and pretext. The mistake is turning "trigger" into "cause" or "justification."

The Institute for Strategic Dialogue found an over 50-fold increase in the absolute volume of antisemitic YouTube comments about the Israel-Palestine conflict following Hamas's October 7 attacks, and said the overall proportion of antisemitic comments tripled. It also found that older conspiracy theories were folded into the conflict, including claims about Jewish control of political, media, and financial institutions.

UK government data tells a similar trigger story. The Home Office reported that religious hate crimes in England and Wales rose 25 percent in the year ending March 2024, driven by a rise in hate crimes against Jewish people and, to a lesser extent, Muslims, after the Israel-Hamas conflict began. Police recorded 3,282 religious hate crimes targeted at Jewish people, more than double the previous year.

The European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights has measured the same collective-blame problem. The BBC's report on FRA's 2024 survey notes that 75 percent of surveyed Jews in 13 EU countries felt they were held responsible for the Israeli government's actions because they are Jewish. That is the exact slide this article is warning about: from a government's action to a Jew's safety.

In the United States, the Justice Department's summary of 2023 FBI hate-crime statistics says there were 2,699 religion-based incidents and that more than half, 1,832, were driven by anti-Jewish bias. That data does not say Israel is the cause. It says anti-Jewish bias is a real category of hate crime in American life.

The "if Israel disappeared" line removes agency

The claim "there would be no antisemitism if Israel did not exist" sounds like political analysis, but it quietly removes the antisemite from the story. It treats harassment as a natural chemical reaction instead of a choice.

People choose whether to hold a local Jew responsible for a foreign government. People choose whether to turn grief for Palestinian civilians into blood libel. People choose whether to describe a lobby, a state, or a prime minister with evidence, or to announce that Jews run the world. Those choices belong to the speaker.

What Israel can be responsible for

Its government's laws, military decisions, rhetoric, coalitions, settlements, courts, and diplomacy.

Governments answer for government action.

What Israel cannot be responsible for

Centuries-old myths about Jews, hate crimes against diaspora Jews, synagogue vandalism, Holocaust jokes, child-murder fantasies, and world-control conspiracies.

Bigots answer for bigotry.

A better test

When someone says Israel is the source of antisemitism, ask what kind of sentence they are really making.

  • Does it name a specific Israeli policy, or does it blame Jews as a people?
  • Does it distinguish Israeli citizens, Israeli officials, diaspora Jews, and Jewish institutions?
  • Does it use old images: blood, children, secret money, media control, war plots, or dual loyalty?
  • Would the same standard be applied to any other diaspora group when a foreign state behaves badly?
  • Does it ask antisemites to stop, or does it ask Jews to disappear first?

If the argument cannot pass those tests, it is not a brave critique of Israel. It is an old story looking for a modern alibi.

Selected sources

Mostly reference, government, polling, and extremism-research sources, with on-site trope explainers for related patterns.